Tuesday, October 21, 2014

What It Means To Be HIV Equal

Small
By: Tyler Curry
June 1st, 2014

As a reluctant HIV activist, there have only been a handful of public messages about facing down the stigma of being positive that have truly resonated with me. Sure, there are many organizations putting out meaningful content with admirable intent, but their campaigns seem to often fall into only one of two categories.
They go a little something like this:

"If you are negative, take charge and save yourself before it’s too late."

"If you are positive, you don’t have to feel like garbage even though society may view you as such. Life doesn’t have to suck as much as you think it does."
As lovely as these campaigns may be, I was neither HIV negative nor did I ever allow myself to feel like garbage and I certainly didn’t care to listen to others talk about me being such.

This feeling of in-between led me to publish my first article on HIV, called “The Needle Prick: Reluctant Commentary of a Newly Positive 20-Something,” and many subsequent articles since. With titles like “HIV Positive, Unapologetic and Fabulous,” and “HIV Positive and Sexy as I Want to be,” I may have raised a few eyebrows. The titles were certainly salacious, which that was the point, but the material was always heartfelt and written with a very purposeful message. My intention was to wake up those who were a little wary of the usual HIV essay, both positive and negative, and force them to try on a new way of thinking about the virus. If baring a little skin and shocking your system to snap you out of a media haze was what it took, then someone turn the heater on because these clothes were coming off.

Still, I struggled to craft the exact message that I, myself, would want to hear. In the meantime, even though it seemed that many were moved by the content I crafted, others took umbrage with the nuance of my words. I kept telling myself that you can’t win them all, right? But then again, maybe you can.

After the first ten or twenty columns on living confidently with HIV were published, many newly HIV positive men began to ask me how do I do it. How do I not let the nasty sink in, marinating under the surface and poisoning my self-confidence? Or, to put it simply, how do I keep my head high in the dating pool?

Sure, I have been called all of the usual names: slut, skank, diseased whore, used up trash, so on and so forth. My personal favorite was the Queen of HIV (although I am sure it was meant as an insult, I still giggled and pictured a silly red crown full of ribbons). Several HIV negative and positive men accused me of trying to glamorize HIV, that I was delusional, and that my erroneous self-confidence was merely some sort of a defense mechanism.

As the calamity of insults ensued, pessimistic onlookers waited in anticipation for me to have my epiphany that I am, somehow, less than I was before. It was as if my detractors thought I was high on the drug of attention and once it wore off, the cold reality would set in.

I was angry, but not because I ever bought into any of this nonsense purported by my detractors. It was because I noticed that many HIV positive men silently nodded their head in agreement, resigning themselves to a lower notch than they previously held when they were HIV negative. Just like anything in life, something is only true once you agree to it. There had to be some message, some new approach that would help break this delusional ascending order to pieces.

It was then that my friend and mentor, Jack Mackenroth, a brilliant photographer named Thomas Evans and the team at World Health Clinicians came out with a new campaign and a name and tagline that seemed to read my mind.

It was called the HIV Equal campaign. The tagline; “Everybody has a status. We are all HIV Equal.”

It was simple, yet profound. At first, the obvious message may settle on the service. But after a minute of reflecting on what being HIV equal meant to me, it was the jumbling of words I had been struggling to find.

In the 50 or so essays that I have published on this topic, the rambling of words can always be reduced to a simple message. Some people struggle with addiction. Others battle an unhealthy body image. Many of us have struggled with poverty. Even more of us have experienced rejection. Racism still exists. Diseases happen to the good, the bad, and the various shades in between. But no matter how bad you may have it, someone can trump you.

To every newly positive man who looked at me with defeat, asking how I can be so confident while so many judge, we are all equal. To every long-term survivor that doubted if my steadfast determination to not let my diagnosis break my stride would last, we are all equal. And to every queen who scoffed at the notion that we were equal until he received a positive diagnosis, we are all equal.

Everybody has a status; short, fat, tall, hairy, selfish, depressed, bald, skinny, poor, rich, ugly, beautiful, HIV negative, shy, big eared, small hands, silly, serious, stupid, smart or HIV Positive. Whether you don these statuses with pride or with defeat, we are all a collection of the definitions that we wear. But we have at least two things in common. We are human and we are imperfect.

That is what it means to be HIV equal.

http://www.hivequal.org/hiv-equal-online/what-it-means-to-be-hiv-equal

The HIV Shame Game: What Role Do You Play?

Small
By: Tyler Curry
September 17th, 2014
Throughout the modern history of homosexual dating and fornicating, there has always been an undeniable and resilient link between sex and shame. The gay movement has made much progress in relinquishing some of the guilt associated with our innate attraction to the same sex, but shame still lingers within our ranks. Sure, we now can be seen holding hands in Texas and kissing in Georgia, but there is still a healthy amount of these guilty thoughts among gay men when it comes to their sex life.
And there is no place where shame is more apparent then when it comes to the conversation of sex and HIV. Why is that? Well, because there is still an unsettling association between gay sex and the pesky virus. And when shame is involved, we are always looking for someone else to blame.
Naturally, it is easiest to pinpoint those who outwardly identify themselves as HIV positive as the ones to blame for the continuation of this stain on our community. It is easy to forget that these individuals were also HIV negative at one point in time and, most likely, consumed with the same fears of transmission as the rest of the HIV negative demographic. Now, they must assimilate to the HIV positive ranks and be constantly berated with stereotypes of behavior and health fallacies, which plague a population that should know better. It can be a difficult road for some, depending on how privileged they were before discovering their new identity. As it turns out, those who dish the most shame aren't very good at taking it.
Of course, the shaming of those with HIV doesn't occur in a blatantly obtuse fashion. We have come a long way since the AIDS virus was discovered 32 years ago. Then, the viral divide was like a gaping crevice within the gay community that had people plummeting to their death. Now, depths of the crevice are much more shallow. People who are diagnosed as HIV positive are no longer plummeting, but rather cast down into a lower rung in the community where they are expected to stay. How do we keep them in their place? Through shame in the form of stigmatization and judgment.
Just like any prejudice born out of fear, we must eliminate the ominous stereotypes and prerequisite judgments that perpetuate HIV stigma within the gay community. But where do we start? The answer is simple. We assess the language of the HIV culture and remove the words that inherently cast shades of shame.
Coming from a community that just recently removed the 'F' word from America's common vernacular, we know that words – whether intentional or not --  are sometimes all it takes to keep a second class firmly in their place. Whether it is the way we address HIV education or the terminology we assign to our status, the HIV language is littered with dirty little innuendos that HIV negative people would never notice and which HIV positive people can't seem to forget.
Speaking of dirty, what could be dirtier than the opposite of clean?
Any single gay man navigating the gay social media apps is bombarded by the stigmatizing sentiment of associating a person's HIV negative status with being "clean."
When asked what he thought about the use of the word "clean" in regard to a person being HIV negative, HIV activist and acclaimed blogger Mark S. King, had this to say:
"I don't mind people who are simply disclosing their status and want to know mine. But 'clean?’ There are ways to get this information without making me feel like one of the great unwashed."
After all, what could be more shameful than being inadvertently labeled as "dirty?”
Who knows whether anyone has ever consciously made the outright connection between an HIV positive person being dirty, but you can only imagine the impact this word can have on the positive community.
According to the Centers for Disease Control, 44 percent of people who are HIV positive are unaware of their status. Unfortunately, the people who may be perpetuating the shame game may soon find that it is they who need the bath. This is where the real danger lies. Allowing language like this to permeate our culture only serves to promote the continuation of the HIV epidemic and enforce a second viral class among the gay community.
Of course, the burden of change rests on the shoulders of those affected the most by the shame game. It may seem easier for HIV positive men to retreat into the shadows when friends and strangers alike unknowingly use language that make them feel like a pariah in dignitaries' clothing. However, many of these accidental offenders are victims of the same phenomenon that was the basis of so much prejudice against gay men and women. They simply don't have a personal connection to the disease. HIV positive men owe it to themselves to speak out against language that demeans their worth. They also owe it to their HIV negative friends to educate them on the reality so that they don't continue to proliferate stigma or believe that they are removed from risk.
HIV positive men aren't victims, vampires, zombies or martyrs. The social and psychological factors surrounding infection are complex, difficult and impossible to simplify into one category.
Of course, the language we use and terminology we've chosen to isolate one another is just the one element of the shaming that goes on within the gay community. Combating HIV stigma is a multifarious problem that will require numerous endeavors and will take time before we start seeing measurable change.
Until then, we must remain prudent in our efforts to erasing the divide that only serves to hinder our community and proliferate HIV infection. The next chapter in the fight against HIV begins with learning from our own history and removing words that place shame on some and keep others in the risk pool.
Like I said before, it starts with those who are HIV positive to speak out against hurtful terminology and naïve generalizations that pervade their surroundings.
So I'll start.
My name is Tyler Curry. I am HIV positive and there ain't no shame in my game.

 http://www.hivequal.org/hiv-equal-online/the-hiv-shame-game-what-role-do-you-play

Why Gay Men Should Never Make Ebola Jokes

Small
By: Tyler Curry
October 19th, 2014

 The past few weeks have been an unyielding rigmarole of Ebola, Ebola fear and fear-mongering journalism. Whether it was a report on quarantines of those who have been exposed, debates on possible travel bans to Liberia, Guinea and Sierra Leone, a witch hunt for those responsible at Texas Presbyterian or concerns over whether a dog could carry the virus, the American public has experienced a bout of information overload that would leave even the biggest news junkie ready to change the channel.

Naturally, there is a tendency to lean on humor in times of intense overexposure to such a serious topic. There has been talk about how to dress up as Ebola for Halloween, several comics have made jests about outbreaks at major gatherings and the fear of the virus has almost taken on a cartoonish appeal, given that only one person has died from the disease in the U.S. And who is better at making the sometimes inappropriate, maybe-too-soon, à la Joan Rivers joke than gay men? But as much as the gay community loves a good off-colored pun, the sensitive nature that is the Ebola crisis should strike some place so close to home that nothing could be funny about such an awful tragedy.

For those who lived through the beginning of the AIDS crisis of the 1980s, you know all too well how it feels to have your community ravaged by a disease while outside onlookers barely flinch. That is, until a heterosexual person or man-of-interest contracted HIV and an all out panacea of fear spread throughout the nation. And you, the gay man who had lost half, or maybe more of your loved ones, has to watch the news as the entire country rallies around a few people who “mattered.”

For those who were born in the 80s or after, picture this:

It is 1983, and you and your best 20-something guy friends are listening to the latest Madonna song while you get ready to go out to the gay bars. You are not just in the gay community; you are in the community, as this was before the era of gay-is-the-new-black, corporate-sponsored-Pride-parades, gay-dads-on-T.V. You are isolated, confined to the gay ghetto that houses your entire world and all of the people who you love. But life is good as long as you have your friends who now feel like family and maybe a boyfriend if you are lucky.

As Madonna tempts you and your homo clique to take a holiday, you notice a dime-sized red sore on your friend’s hand. He nervously says that it’s nothing and you continue the night as if nothing is the matter. But this is 1983, two years after the gay plague had begun to spread among your community. You know it’s something called AIDS, and that it is probably going to kill your friend, maybe even you.

Now its six months later, and you have to decide which of your friends’ funerals to go to. It is 1984 and the fear of AIDS has crippled the gay community and is even starting to get some pretty decent news coverage. It has taken two of your lovers, many of your friends, and almost all hope of living a normal, happy life. Sure, you have moments of reprieve, but the sheer pain of loss has become commonplace and natural. The worse part is, no one outside of the gay community still seems to give a damn.

Now, it is 1985, and the President finally makes the containment of AIDS a priority. Almost 5,000 of gay men just like you are dead, but the media focus is on only but a few heterosexuals who have unfortunately contracted the virus. As the American masses learned more about the nature of HIV, how it was transmitted and whom it affected the most, the wildfire of fear and panic allays to a slow burn as most people realized that they most likely wouldn’t contract the virus. Even though HIV continues to dominate the headlines, it also becomes a punch line for those who are tired of hearing about HIV-this and AIDS-that. Someone you know, albeit distantly as they are not a part of the gay community, thinks it is funny to dress up as AIDS for a night because it’s ironic, timely and just a joke. And he isn’t the only one.

Ebola is different from AIDS. It is transmitted differently, it affects the body differently and it is targeting a different population. It also has taken nine months to kill the amount of people that took HIV four years. For the many in West Africa who have recently buried their loved ones, the pain is fresh, blinding and wrought with anger and grief.

Imagine burying your sister, your mother or your husband, or maybe all three. There is no infrastructure to control the growing epidemic that has brought crippling fear in your town. The outside world is looking at quarantining your entire country, and you are just trying to survive.

Now ask yourself, do you still think it’s not too soon to crack an Ebola joke?

Gay men now enjoy the luxury of dancing in and out of the gay ghetto that once imprisoned their homosexual identities. We are moving into the suburbs, having babies, getting married and inching toward equality day by day. And as we step further and further away from the struggle and tragedies that quite literally plagued the gay community in the 80s and 90s, we run the risk of becoming as insensitive as the people that we have spent years fighting again.

As gay men, we cannot only care about the issues that directly impact us while we laugh at the ones that affect others. Most of us still cringe when someone makes an AIDS joke because, 30 years later, it’s still not funny. An AIDS Halloween costume will never be appropriate; not yesterday, not today and certainly not tomorrow. So, when it comes to Ebola, just take a minute to think how it would feel to hear someone who has lost no one joking about a disease that just wiped out your community.

http://www.hivequal.org/hiv-equal-online/why-gay-men-should-never-make-ebola-jokes


   12.01.2014 World AIDS Day
Columbus, Ohio